- 关于我们
- 针对假冒留学监理网的声明
- 留学热线:4000-315-285
时间:2016-07-28
来源:互联网
你是否也在写GRE作文时提笔又不知何从下手?同学们不用担心,今天呢,留学监理网的老师就来给大家提供几种文章的开头的方式,同学们不妨借鉴一下。
In this argument, the arguer concludes that sending the mechanics of GAA to a two-week QCS on proper maintenance procedures will automatically lead to improved maintenance and to greater customer satisfaction along with greater profits for the airline. To support the conclusion, the arguer points out that the performance of the maintenance crews in the automobile racing industry improved markedly after their crews had attended the seminar. In addition, the arguer reasons that since the maintenance crews of the automobile racing industry and the mechanics of GAA perform many of the same functions, the airlines will gain similar benefits from the training program. This argument suffers from several critical fallacies.
In this argument, the arguer recommends that C should advise its citizens to install both air conditioners and fans for cooling in order to reduce the cost of electricity. To justify this claim, the arguer provides the evidence that many citizens of C suffer from the rising costs of electricity. In addition, he cites the result of a recent study that using fans alone costs more than using air conditioners alone, and that using both fans and air conditioners costs less than either using fans or air conditioners alone. A careful examination of this argument would reveal how groundless the conclusion is.
In this analysis, the arguer claims that P University should offer employment to the spouse of each new faculty member that they hire. To substantiate the conclusion, the arguer cites the example of B College where professors prefer to have their spouse employed in the same geographical area. In addition, the arguer assumes that this offer of possible job for their spouse on the campus, no matter whether it will be accepted, is the only factor that new professors consider in deciding whether to accept a university position. This argument is unconvincing for several critical flaws.
In this argument, the arguer advocates that the C Corporation should hire DF, a family owned local company that offers varied menu of fish and poultry, instead of GT Company, the present supplier of food in C’s employee cafeteria. The recommendation is based on the observation that the GT is expensive, that its prices have kept rising, that it does not serve special diets, and that three employees complained about it. Meanwhile, the arguer assumes D to be a better choice for C because a sample lunch of this company that the arguer happened to taste was delicious. This argument is problematic for two reasons.
The conclusion in this argument is that F College can expect to increase enrollment by promising to find jobs for students after graduation. In support of this prediction, the arguer claims that college-bound students are increasingly concerned about job prospects after graduation. Moreover, the arguer assumes that this attempt has three benefits: (1) to enable F to compete with more famous schools; (2) to encourage students to start career preparation early; (3) to encourage students to complete their coursework. This argument is fraught with vague, oversimplified and unwarranted assumptions.
当然,开头方式不仅仅局限于以上几种,同学们完全可以发挥自己的想象和创造力,写出更为精彩、不同的开头。
大家可以关注我们的“朝九晚五话留学”微信公众号,以获取更多关于留学、考试以及海外咨讯的信息。
(特别申明:本站除原创图片外,其他图片来源于网络,版权归作者所有,如有侵权,请联系我们删除。)
跟我差不多情况的学长们都申请去了哪里?输入自身情况,真实案例比对,助你快速留学定位。流程:注册/登录>输入自身情况>留学方案定位
中教安学旗下留学监理网不是留学中介,所以能给你最客观的建议。5年以上经验的留学监理师,10年大量真实案例,留学方案值得你参考。
登陆成功,欢迎使用留学监理网!